from LinkedInTalks
Most account restrictions occur due to indiscriminate invitations, which is what we'll focus this page on.
Stop Yer Cryin'
Please note: You are now required to enter an email address to send invitations from this page because several recipients of your invitations indicated they don’t know you. This safeguard is in place to prevent users from receiving unwanted invitations from people they don’t know. Customer Service can remove the restriction at anytime once you indicate that you understand this policy.
This is the first restriction. You're forced to use an email address. Not a big problem in the scheme of things. So we're moving on.
Serious Sh*t
You've really hit the big time when you can no longer send invitations.
When five of your LinkedIn invitations are responded to with ‘I Don’t Know’ (IDK) (or Report as Spam) your account is automatically restricted. The restriction prevents the member from sending more invitations or being granted additional invitations. And you typically are NOT notified. ... Aren't they nice?
Is it me?
Well, it MAY be your breath. But in general, no. It affects many people (including me numerous times). The automatic restriction has spanked thousands of LinkedIn members.
The setting and automatic process are overzealous. LinkedIn has considered changing the system, including simply increasing the IDK limit, but has not done so at this time.
Is it fair?
No, it's deceptive in my opinion.
LinkedIn has no way to say no ... to invitations, that is.
LinkedIn used to have a simple ‘No’ button for recipients to respond to an invitation. They replaced it with ‘I Don’t Know’ (IDK). While IDK is used legitimately, many times it's not for various reasons.
- They know the sender but decline to accept because they don't know the sender well enough, only connect with close friends, only connect with certain people, only connect to few people, aren't currently adding connections, aren't actively using LinkedIn, etc.
- They don't want to archive it because that just means they'll eventually still have to act on it.
- There is no way to simply say they're not interested at this time.
In the end their only choice is IDK. This is deceptive multiple ways.
- LinkedIn's poor design results in some users to using an IDK ... when recipients DO know the sender.
- LinkedIn treats the IDK as a complaint. But it's not and they know it. In fact there is a complaint button - the link to report the invitation as spam.
- In most cases the recipient does NOT intend to harm the sender in any way. If they knew that an IDK could lead the sender being restricted, they likely would not choose it.
The IDK limit is based on total number of IDKs. It is not based on any period and it is not based on the number of invitations sent or percentage of IDKs on invitations sent. As a result it automatically penalizes ActiveNetworkers who know more people and send more invitations.
What can I do about the restriction?
Customer Service rarely informs and notifies customers. If you discover your account is restricted, your only recourse is to respond as if you received a restriction notification (see below). Write Customer Service to tell them you'll comply with LinkedIn policies and only invite people you know.
Wait a few days. If you haven't heard anything, check your account. If the restriction has not been lifted, write Customer Service regularly until it is.
Account restriction notice
From: LinkedIn Customer Service
Subject: Re: your account is restricted ...
[...]
Thank you for contacting LinkedIn customer service. A recent update to
our website now allows users to invite trusted contacts into their
network without knowing the users email address. We believe this feature
benefits our members and prevents the sender from guessing email
addresses or erroneously upgrading their account to contact friends or
past business acquaintances. On the downside, if you send a large amount
of invitations to join your network to individuals you do not know, they
have the option to report invitation spam. Five complaints automatically
forces our system to restrict your account.
We are especially cautious with our new feature, as it doesn?t require
an email address in order to send an invitation making it easier to
misuse. We?re committed to protecting the privacy of all users while
also helping our users make mutually desirable connections with each
other. When we get your agreement to follow these rules we will remove
the restriction on your account.
Below are steps you can take to prevent further restrictions to your
LinkedIn account:
1. Only invite people to connect to you on LinkedIn who already know
you.
2. Reconnect invitations should be sent only to people who know you
personally and who knew you while you were both employed at the same
company or attending the same school.
3. If people you don't know ask to be invited to connect, those are OK
to invite with a personalized invitation. However, note that if you
connect to people you don?t know, there are some who may not protect
your interests.
4. If there are others you want to reach who don?t know you, you should
use LinkedIn InMail, OpenLink, or Introduction requests.
Invitations are free for all members to send and these rules are the
only requirement for sending them. After a second warning such as this
one, we enforce these rules by closing or suspending accounts if the
rules continue to not be followed.
We wholeheartedly appreciate each LinkedIn user and must take each
complaint seriously. With your agreement to no longer send invitations
to individuals you do not know, I will gladly unrestrict your account.
Thanks for your understanding, and thanks for using LinkedIn.
LinkedIn Privacy Team-
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.